Pressure Test

Stress-test sales material before submission.

Upload a proposal or deck. AI simulates a 3-person buying committee that raises specific objections against your actual document. Get a gap report before you pitch.

Try the demo Request access
How It Works

Three steps. About fifteen seconds.

You hand over the document. The system does the research, builds the committee, and runs the critique.

1

Upload your material

Drag a file in, or paste text directly — we accept both.

  • PDF or DOCX, up to 50 MB
  • Up to 50 pages parsed
  • Or paste raw text
2

AI does the research

Detects industry and deal stage from the document. Pulls real executives at the target company from live web search.

  • Industry inference from content
  • Deal stage classification
  • Executive identification via web search
3

Get stress-tested output

A 3-person committee, five specific objections each, every objection cited to lines in your own material.

  • Severity-ranked: deal-killer, critical, major, minor
  • Gap report with verdict and Top 3 fixes
  • PDF export for team review
The Output

What a stress test actually shows.

Objections you can act on, cited to lines in your own material. A verdict you can take to your team.

Committee · expanded
MS
Maria Santos AI Persona
CFO
5 objections · 1 deal-killer · 2 critical · 2 major
Sev 5 · Deal-killer
"The deck claims 40% cost reduction from cloud migration, but there is no methodology, no baseline measurement period, and no definition of which cost categories are included. Before we commit budget, I need an independently audited baseline of our current cloud spend and a contractual commitment to the 40% figure, not a marketing headline. If the realized savings are 15%, what is the remedy?"
Targeting "Expected Outcomes — 40% Cloud Cost Reduction within 12 months" Why this matters Unverified percentage claims undermine the business case and cannot be taken to the board without backing evidence.
maverickai-sea · Pressure Test Report
Stress Test: Cloud Migration Proposal v3
Verdict: Needs Major Rework
Full gap report · Top 3 fixes · 12 pages
Gap report · summary
Verdict
Needs Major Rework

Strengths 5

  • Partner certifications are substantiated with named accreditations
  • SLA response times are quantified in minutes, not business days
  • Three-tier pricing structure gives commercial optionality

Critical gaps 6

  • No data residency framework for regulated workloads
  • No jurisdiction-level TCO breakdown across operating countries
  • No recertification plan for safety-regulated platforms

Top 3 fixes

  • Rebuild the business case with an audited baseline; isolate incremental savings
  • Add a workload tier that stays on-prem for safety-regulated systems
  • Define written exit-readiness criteria with partner-side accountability
Interactive Demo

See it run, end to end.

A fictional manufacturing company evaluating a managed cloud migration proposal. No API calls — every number, name, and objection is canned.

Demo walkthrough · fictional company · no real API calls made
pressure-test · demo
1 · Your Material
PDF
CloudMigration_Proposal_v3.pdf
4.2 MB · attached
2 · Deal Context
Acme Industries
$ 2,500,000
Working on your material
This takes about 15 seconds in the real tool.
  • Parsing material…
  • Detecting industry and deal stage…
  • Researching Acme Industries…
  • Verifying decision makers…
  • Finalizing analysis…
What we understood
4,120 words 28 pages Type · Proposal Tone · Professional
This is a managed cloud migration services proposal from a technology consulting firm to Acme Industries. It outlines a 3-year engagement covering lift-and-shift migration of on-premises workloads to a hyperscaler, managed services operations, cost optimization via FinOps practices, and a proposed 40% cost reduction outcome. The deck covers partner certifications, SLA commitments, governance model, and pricing structure across three pricing tiers.
Key claims we spotted
  • 40% cloud cost reduction within 12 months
  • $12M three-year net present value
  • Lift-and-shift migration in 18 months
  • Three-tier FinOps-managed pricing model
  • 99.9% SLA commitment across managed services
Deal context · inferred from your material
High confidence
Acme Industries operates in manufacturing with multi-site operations. The proposal targets a 3-year enterprise engagement — this reads as a formal proposal stage, not a first discovery conversation, based on the level of solution detail and pricing specificity.
Industry Manufacturing (heavy) Stage Proposal
Suggested decision makers · surfaced by AI — verify before use
Maria Santos High
Chief Executive Officer · Acme Industries
David Chen High
Chief Financial Officer · Acme Industries
Priya Patel High
Chief Technology Officer · Acme Industries
James Wilson Medium
Head of Risk & Compliance · Acme Industries
Building your committee
Three executives, five specific objections each, cited to your material.
  • Building committee…
  • Generating objections…
  • Compiling gap report…
Verdict
Needs Major Rework
Buying committee objections
Gap Report
  • Partner certifications are substantiated with named accreditations
  • SLA response times are quantified in minutes, not business days
  • Three-tier pricing structure gives some commercial optionality
  • Dedicated transition lead named with 8 years of relevant experience
  • References include a customer of comparable scale in an adjacent vertical
  • No data residency framework for regulated workloads
  • No jurisdiction-level TCO breakdown across operating countries
  • No separation of migration-driven savings from already-budgeted effects
  • No recertification plan for safety-regulated manufacturing platforms
  • No customer-side exit readiness criterion or ownership transfer test
  • No contractual downside clause for reduced consumption volumes
  • "40% cloud cost reduction" with no methodology or baseline period
  • "$12M three-year NPV" without isolation of incremental impact
  • "Proven migration playbook" backed by one reference with 20% of this scale
  • "Best-in-class FinOps" with no audit rights or passthrough transparency

Top 3 Fixes

  1. Rebuild the business case with an independently audited baseline, isolating only incremental migration-driven savings from pre-budgeted effects. Add a contractual remedy if realized savings fall below the stated 40%.
  2. Define a workload tier that stays on-prem for safety-regulated platforms, with a clear technical boundary and a pathway that doesn't force a 9-14 month recertification into the critical path.
  3. Add a written exit-readiness framework — specific certifications, solo runbook executions, incident ownership transfers — with partner-side accountability if the customer team is not operational at month 30.
This was a demo walkthrough. Request access below for real pressure tests on your own material.
Under The Hood

Built on production AI infrastructure.

No black boxes. Here's what runs the tool.

Reasoning
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Generates committee objections, verdict, and gap report. Picked for judgment-heavy output.
Fast inference
Claude Haiku 4.5
Handles industry inference and decision-maker discovery. Cheap, fast, parallelized.
Web research
Real-time search
Identifies current executives at the target company from live web sources.
Hosting
AWS EC2 + CloudFlare
Runs on a compact EC2 instance behind CloudFlare. No cold starts.
End-to-end
~15 seconds
From document upload to full stress-tested output. Parallelized pipeline.
Input
PDF, DOCX, paste
Up to 50 MB, up to 50 pages parsed. Raw text paste is also supported.
Request Access

Want to run this on your own material?

Leave your details. We'll reach out within two business days.